The Bilderberg Group

The time is now for the truth to be told.  I no longer care how people view me, or what the consequences might be.  My goal in the next few posts will be to tell you who is running this country and this world behind the scenes.  Let me now introduce you to the Bilderberg group.

This highly secret and influential group was begun in 1954 by the former Polish politician Jozef Retinger.  Fearing anti-American sentiments in Europe, Retinger proposed a meeting of some of the most powerful men in Western Europe and the United States.  The goal of this meeting was to work out a solution for economic and militaristic tranquility amongst the nations.  Since its founding, the group has been meeting every few years.  The stated goal of these meetings are for nations to work together to achieve and common good for all nations involved.  However, the truth of the matter is much more devious and evil.

This group was created to serve as a sort of consensus as to what was for the 'public good'.  By meeting with the most powerful men in the world of politics and finance, the group can ensure that its desires be carried out.  The meetings also serve as an 'interview' for potential future leaders.  Including Clinton in '91 and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair in '93.  The guest list has included such prominent and powerful names as: Rick Perry, Ben Bernanke(Chairman of the Fed), Chris Hughes(co founder of Facebook), Craig Mundy(Microsoft), Colin Powell, Gerald Ford, Barack Obama, Timothy Geithner, John Edwards, Margaret Thatcher, and many other powerful leaders in the U.S and abroad.  It must be understood that with such influential men involved, the Bilderberg group has major pull in the world.  It has been reported that the Bilderberg group has helped to establish the EU and the IMF(international monetary fund).  This is hardly surprising since the ultimate goal of the conference in globalism.  The EU is without a doubt, the predecessor to the future one world gov't, foreseen by the Fabian Socialists. 

The idea is to "Remould it nearer to the heart's desire", this is what the Bilderberg group is doing.  This can be seen in several ways.  When the group meets, they work out plans to slowly but surely break down the world's infrastructure and rebuild it in their image.  This is carried out through many different ways.  One such way is through trade agreements, like NAFTA and GATT.  Hidden behind the banner of 'free trade' is the goal of chipping away at nations sovereignty in order to make the shift to globalism smoother.  Central Banks are another way of taking power away from the people and giving it to high ranking 'intellectuals'.  By keeping monetary control over nations, the people are held captive to the will of a select few.  If the Bilderberg group decides economic collapse is what is in the 'best interest' of the people, it is carried out.  Finally, by holding these meetings, the board can decide which leaders best fit their agendas.  These leaders are then thrust onto the public stage and promoted as being the best candidates.

We have already seen the goal of the group and some of the ways they go about accomplishing it, now let's look at some of the more drastic plans of the group.  Reports have surfaced that lay out a deadly plan of destruction through depopulation.  The thought is that, if the world remains in its current state, there are too many people to be effectively subdued in the new world order.  Ideally the current 7 billion people would be cut down to 500 million, for the 'public good' of course.  This would be done slowly by constant vaccination, until the human immune system was too weak and easily susceptible to disease.  Sound familiar?  It is happening as we speak.  Think about how many vaccines you have recieved, and then ask your parents how many they got.  Beyond this biological warfare, is the false flags used by those in power, to create fear and crush freedom.  The best modern example is 9/11(I will share my thoughts on that in a future bolg).  These flags scare people into allowing gov't to take away their freedom for the promise of security.  Finally, I believe the group is using economic collapse to bring about their ideal one world gov't.  When a nation is strong, there is no chance of it surrendering their sovereignty.  However, when its economy is weak, it is willing to sacrifice its power to survive.  What is soon approaching is a world-wide economic collapse, that will bring about a new world currency, designed to cancel debt and help dying economies.  From their a one world gov't is not far off.  This is the goal of Woodrow Wilson, Keynes, Rothschild, and Rockefeller. 

I know all of this may seem extreme, so I offer you one last quote from the memoirs of John D. Rockefeller

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

The end may be here

We may have entered the last days of our nation.  Although I was confident this would come to pass soon, I did not know we were this close.  Greece announced the other day that it would referendum the EU bailout.  As soon as this was announced, stock markets around the world plummeted.  The previously surging Dow dropped over 200 points.  The Greek Parliament is in shambles as many several members have defected.  Within days to weeks Greece will fall. and the EU will likely follow.  As i have predicted in the past that the collapse of the EU could likely lead to our own collapse.  If America falls, nations like China and India would fall with us, since both of their countries rely heavily on us as a constant source of money.  What will likely follow is a world conference in which all the G-20 countries will cancel the debt and issue a new world currency.  From there a one-world gov't is not a far reach.  I have a strange and dark feeling that in the next few months it will all be over.

What is happening to our nation?

Over the last few weeks, I have made my opinion regarding our nation very clear.  Based on my extensive research, and willingness to accept the facts, i believe we are on the edge of collapse as a nation.  If you were to read through all of my posts(which I believe would be beneficial) you would be able to see why I feel we are in grave and imminent danger.  However, for the sake of convience, I will attempt to summarize several posts into one.  My hope is that after you read this you will fully understand the danger we face, and join me in fighting it.

The Federal Reserve

I believe it to be necessary to start at, what I consider to be, the root cause of our problems; The Federal Reserve.  The Federal Reserve is the U.S central bank that was started when the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913.  Three years earlier, 1910, a secret meeting was called by Nelson Aldrich on Jekyll Island.  In attendance were powerful men like JP Morgan, John D. Rockefellar, and Paul Warburg.  These men represented 25% of the worlds wealth!  The goal of this meeting was to unite their banks to eliminate competition.  When the Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913, the Fed was given the right to coin money and control interest rates, a right that is given to Congress under the Constitution.  It is also important to note that the Federal Reserve is a private banking cartel and NOT a gov't organization.  Since 1913, the Fed has been doing its best to destroy America, by controlling money.  Starting with the depression in 1929, the Feds policies have proven to be ineffective.

The process in which the Fed has caused recession is a little complicated.  When banks loan money they have no desire to be paid back, they instead look to make money of interest.  For example, when a bank loans $20 they look to make that money back plus $10 on interest.  Therefore, the larger the loan, the better.  Big loan mean lots of money of interest.  There is, however, a problem created by the market; big loans are big risks.  When banks loan large sums of money they run the risk of the borrower not being able to pay them back and having to 'swallow' their losses.  If a bank does this too often, it fails and goes out of buisness.  This allows the market to function smoothly.  The Fed has destroyed this natural barrier.  The Fed promises banks that they will always back up their loans.  This causes banks to make large and risky loans, seeking high interest payments.  What results is a 'boom' cycle where the economy is growing rapidly.  This can be seen in the 'roaring 20's'.  However, reckless bank loans have consequences.  When borrowers can no longer make their payments, banks refuse to swallow their losses and look to the Fed to bail them out.  The Fed does just that by printing billions of new dollars and telling the gov't to raise taxes on the people.  What follows is recession, or a 'bust' cycle.  This is exactly what happened in '08.

I must digress in order to explain what exactly the Fed does.  When the Federal gov't spends more than it has and finds itself in debt, they go to the Fed for a loan.  The moment the gov't asks for the loan the Fed creates the money out of thin air and lends it, charging interest.  Thats right, the Fed just makes it and then the gov't spends it.  This seems great but unfortuantely the result is huge inflation.  Inflation is why prices seem so high.  In reality your money is just worth less.  This is a dangerous trend, since it allows the gov't to have no spending cap and inflation kills the economy.

Foreign Conflict

I have had the least to say on this issue, simply because it is harder to gauge.  Unlike economics which is mathmatical and can be easily seen and reported, foreign policy deals with human emotion and is difficult to gauge.  Having said that, some things can be seen easily.  What is the most obvious is that the world is on the brink of conflict. Countries like North Korea, China, and Iran are powerful and unstable.  If they decided to make a move, the consequences could be massive.  Technology exists today that people 15 years ago couldnt even imagine.  Bombs small enough to fit in brief cases can destroy entire cities.  It has been shown that China has been behind numerous technological attacks on our nation. Icluding hacking large companies computer systems.  Iran is seeking an EMP that, if detonated, would destroy all of our satellites.  Cars, phones, computers, and everything else that uses a satellite with shut off; the effects would be catostrophic. 

One of the biggest dangers in this area is our debt to China.  If we look back through history to the post WW2 area, we can look at a simliar situation.  Soon after the Suiz canal was built, England and France began fighting with Egypt over control of it.  The U.S, war-weary, wanted to avoid conflict at all costs.  At this time, The U.S owned billions of dollars of English debt.  They threatened that if England did not cease fighting with Egypt, they would liquidate Englands debt, causing the destruction of the English currency.  England was forced to back off.  Many historians consider this to be the official end of the British Empire.  This is the exact power that China has over us today. They can wage economic warfare against us, if they so choose.  The only thing keeping them from doing this is the fact that we are funding their growth.  When they no longer need us, they could do this.

Big Brother

To me, this is the scariest trend that we are seeing today.  Over the years since 9/11, our gov't has ripped our freedom from us in the name of 'security'.  This was begun by the Patriot Act.  This bill was shoved through in the wake of 9/11, and allowed the gov't to take away the liberty of Americans more than ever before in history.  To start with it allowed the gov't to monitor phone calls, emails, and internet use.  It also allowed the gov't to take American citizens prisoner without a trial, denying them of their sixth ammendant rights.  In edition to the Patriot Act several Executive orders were passed under the Bush administration to rob Americans of their freedom.  Including one that allowed anyone who the President considers an 'enemy combatant of the state' to be treated as a war criminal.  Also under the Partiot Act, security cameras and other invasive technologies have increased.  One example of this technology is OnStar.  The service, found in almost all new cars, can see see how fast your car is going and shut it off anytime it wants.  Even if the service is not activated!

What I am most fearful of, is that when the nation falls apart and chaos ensues, the result will be martial law.  This would mean a ploice state where Constitutional rights are denied, in the name of 'public good'.  In a choatic situation, our nation could quickly find itself in a Communist-like state.  Don't believe me?  Look at what happened after Katrina.  The steps have already been taken to do this.  The surveillence needed to spy on citizens is already in place.  A private army, Blackwater, is slowly moving to towns all across the nation. In fact, we have cocentration camps.  They are called FEMA camps and they exist all around our nation.  I would encourage you to look up what these FEMA camps are.  The steps have been taken, martial law is a real possibility.

What can we do?

I have given a detailed response as to what can be done to prepare for this collapse; it is called: How to Prepare.  If you have any questions I would encourage you to look to that.  I, however, want to focus on something else right now.  If the worst case scenario happens, and everything falls apart and martial law follows; thousands will die.  I will fight this until I die, but the fact is that the people might lose.  We could find ourselves in a bleak situation, but there is hope. Our hope is found in Jesus Christ.  Even if I die, my hope is not found in this world, it is found in Him.  If you do not know Him today, seek Him out.  Read a Bible and talk to those around you who can help.  My email is on this blog so email me your questions and I will get back to you.  Time may be running out, turn your lives over to Christ today.  To those of you who do know Him, find your peace in Him.  Times are about to get very tough, but no gov't can take your faith away from you.  We must stand firm in hardship and be a light to this world, even if it costs us everything.  Today is the day to give it all up to Him who can save your soul.  DO NOT WAIT, tommorow isn't promised. 

Limited Atonement

I will now to the best of my ability explain the doctrine of Limited atonement:

Before we dive into this study it is very important to note that there are 4 point Calvinists, and this issue in no way affects your salvation.  Having said this I will now dive into this complicated issue.  I believe the best way to start is by examining Scriptural arguments for both sides of the issue.  I will start with those for unlimited atonement.  1 John 2:2 states: “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only ours but also for the sins of the whole world.” John 4:4 says “He is the savior of the whole world.” John 1:29 says He: “takes away the sins of the world.” 2^nd Cor. 5:14-15 says: “He died for all.”  They argue that Christ died for all, but only the elect receive His sacrifice.  Let me make myself clear; Christ death has the power to atone for all sins, and he could save all people, but he doesn’t.  When we look at the verses above they never say that Christ died for all humans, but rather they say that He died for “the world” or all.  These statements are very general, and we must always remember that when interpreting Scripture context is king.  This means that verses must be taken in the context of the chapter the book and the whole Bible.  The Bible does not and cannot contradict itself.  Having said that take into consideration these verses.  In Luke 2:1 it is recorded that a “decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered” and Luke 2:3 says “So all went to be registered everyone to his own city.” But clearly that it is not talking about every individual in the whole world. Caesar’s decree did not apply to the Japanese, Chinese or countless other people throughout the world.  Similarly, the Pharisees, being dismayed at Jesus’ growing popularity said, “Look how the whole world has gone after Him!” Did every single person in the world follow Jesus? Or was the “world” limited to a small area of Palestine in which Jesus preached?

 So it should be readily apparent that the phrase “all” or “all the world” does not necessarily mean every individual. Understanding that basic fact allows one to consider each of these seemingly universal passages in their context and when that is done it becomes very apparent that they do not present any conflict with the doctrine of limited atonement.  Also the Greek word for world is kosmos which is often used to talk about a specific body of believers.  In addition to this it must be understood that the tenses used in verses like 1 John 2:2 are the same as in John 11:51-52, and it should be understood that the “world” refers to the elect scattered across the globe.

Next I will show you some verses that will show you examples of limited atonement.  Matthew 2:1 says: “He came to die for the sins of His people.” John 10:15 says: “He lays down His life for His sheep” One of the greatest passages on the atonement in the Old Testament is Isaiah 53. In this passage alone we see that He was “stricken for the transgression of God’s people” (Isaiah 53:8); that He would “justify many” because “He shall bear their iniquities” (Isaiah 53:11); and that He indeed “bore the sin of many” (Isaiah 53:12).

 Finally we must understand the very nature of Christ’s death on the cross.  Christ died for this reason; to take on all of our sin and to atone for it, so that we might be justified before God.  With the death of Christ on the cross we are forgiven for all sin and seen as blameless in the sight of God, granting us access into heaven.  If Christ did indeed die for everyone, then the sins of everyone are forgiven, and everyone is justified before the sight of God.  If this is not true than Christ death is not truly an all atoning sacrifice.  As far as the argument that His death atones for everyone, but only the elect with accept it, I have this answer.  If someone doesn’t believe is his unbelief sin? Well of course it is, because he is denying the divine nature of God and in turn bowing down to a false idol.  But isn’t that sin covered by Christ’s death?  Just as believers many sins are?  The answer is yes and that would mean all men are saved and all men go to heaven.  This is obviously heresy and proves the doctrine of unlimited atonement false.  In the words of A.W Pink “Not one for whom He died can possibly miss heaven.” He [Christ] did not ‘pay the penalty of sin’ for those who reject Him, because if He did then they would not have to pay it themselves in hell.  Also if Christ died for all the world, but only the elect benefit, that means that Christ’s atonement did not redeem anyone and is merely a powerless opportunity for men to be saved.  The fact is that if Christ died for all men and propitiated their sins, then all men would be saved because propitiated sin cannot be punished. Also in a certain sense Christ did die for all men.  Even the unsaved can enjoy the sunset and the ocean, we call this common grace.  It is only because of common grace that God doesn’t kill the heathen each time he sins.  God would have every right to kill the sinner, but Christ’s death atones for their earthly life.

In conclusion the death of Christ on the cross is more than enough to atone for every sin in every person, but it does not.Christ died for His elect, which shows His omniscient in choosing His elect in eternity past.This does not change His love for the whole world, but only His atoning sacrifice.I believe I have showed that it is not the Calvinist but rather the Arminian who limits the atonement, by taking away the sovereignty and purpose of Christ’s atonement.

We can conclude this section with the following summary argument. Which of these statements is true?

1. Christ died for some of the sins of all men.

2. Christ died for all the sins of some men.

3. Christ died for all the sins of all men.

No one says that the first is true, for then all would be lost because of the sins that Christ did not die for. The only way to be saved from sin is for Christ to cover it with his blood.

The third statement is what the Arminians would say. Christ died for all the sins of all men. But then why are not all saved? They answer, Because some do not believe. But is this unbelief not one of the sins for which Christ died? If they say yes, then why is it not covered by the blood of Jesus and all unbelievers saved? If they say no (unbelief is not a sin that Christ has died for) then they must say that men can be saved without having all their sins atoned for by Jesus, or they must join us in affirming statement number two: Christ died for all the sins of some men. That is, he died for the unbelief of the elect so that God's punitive wrath is appeased toward them and his grace is free to draw them irresistibly out of darkness into his marvelous light.

The Evil that is Planned Parenthood and Woodrow Wilson

The involvement of planned parenthood in eugenics and racism.

At a March 1925 international birth control gathering in New York City, a speaker warned of the menace posed by the "black" and "yellow" peril. The man was not a Nazi or Klansman; he was Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League (ABCL), which along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Sanger's other colleagues included avowed and sophisticated racists. One, Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate and the author of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. Stoddard was something of a Nazi enthusiast who described the eugenic practices of the Third Reich as "scientific" and "humanitarian." And Dr. Harry Laughlin, another Sanger associate and board member for her group, spoke of purifying America's human "breeding stock" and purging America's "bad strains." These "strains" included the "shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South."

Not to be outdone by her followers, Margaret Sanger spoke of sterilizing those she designated as "unfit," a plan she said would be the "salvation of American civilization.: And she also spike of those who were "irresponsible and reckless," among whom she included those " whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers." She further contended that "there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped." That many Americans of African origin constituted a segment of Sanger considered "unfit" cannot be easily refuted.

While Planned Parenthood's current apologists try to place some distance between the eugenics and birth control movements, history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme figured prominently in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published such articles as "Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics" (June 1920), "The Eugenic Conscience" (February 1921), "The purpose of Eugenics" (December 1924), "Birth Control and Positive Eugenics" (July 1925), "Birth Control: The True Eugenics" (August 1928), and many others.

These eugenic and racial origins are hardly what most people associate with the modern Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), which gave its Margaret Sanger award to the late Dr. Martin Luther King in 1966, and whose current president, Faye Wattleton, is black, a former nurse, and attractive.

Though once a social pariah group, routinely castigated by religious and government leaders, the PPFA is now an established, high-profile, well-funded organization with ample organizational and ideological support in high places of American society and government. Its statistics are accepted by major media and public health officials as "gospel"; its full-page ads appear in major newspapers; its spokespeople are called upon to give authoritative analyses of what America's family policies should be and to prescribe official answers that congressmen, state legislator and Supreme Court justices all accept as "social orthodoxy."

Regarding Woodrow Wilson, although he was America’s most educated President, he was also a bigot and a sexist.  He voted in favor of segregation, even desiring White House bathroom, water fountains, and lunch rooms to be segregated.  Wilson also fought against woman’s suffrage and supported eugenics.  Wilson along with many other prominent names; such as Alexander Graham Bell, Margaret Sanger, and Teddy Roosevelt, supported eugenics in the U.S,that called for the expulsion of blacks in America.  These men supported the evils committed in the Holocaust and it is known that Hitler and Heinrich Himmler, the author of the Holocaust, borrowed some of their ideas from American eugenicists.

Change

As I was taking a walk through my neighborgood this afternoon, enjoying the colors of fall, I began to think about life.  I began to think about how many times I had walked up the street.  I have walked up Walker Road in every season, in every kind of weather, wearing every kind of clothes, doing every kind of activity, for the last 13 years.  Now I am 16, about to leave it all beind, and not sure where all the time went.  Time is fascinating, because those who are in it, have trouble seeing it work.  Think about it this way:  When you see your grandma for the first time in a few months, she is amazed by how much taller you have gotten.  You, on the other hand, haven't noticed this change.  Why? You do not noticed because you are in time.  The change is piece by piece so you don't notice.  However, your grandmother is out of time, so to speak.  The change is clear.  Fascinating, isn't it? 

Now that I have gone off on that tangent, let me get back to my point.  I couldn't get change off my mind.  It surrounded me.  The change in the weather and in the trees, and the coming change in my life.  Change is everything to us.  Think about what the first thing we say to someone we haven't seen in awhile; 'How have you been'.  If not for the fact that we change, this question would be absurd.  'Anything new?'; change!  Let's take it a step further.  Change is the best part of our lives.  What do we look forward to the most in life? Going to school, going to high school, driving, going off to college, starting a career, getting married, having a kid. Change!!  Change is truly the spice of life.  So why do we love change?  I think it is centered around the fact they we are easily bored.  We constantly want a new challenge, something new to do or to conquer.

Here's where it gets really interesting.  We also hate change.  It scares us to death.  We fight it at all costs.  We are frightened by the unknown.  Death, the ultimate change, scares us beyond belief.  We can't imagine how we can live with new drastic changes.  So what we are left with is a great paradox in life.  We love change and yet we hate it.  This can be seen in parenthood.  The new parents are excited about the new change that they are about to experience, and yet frightened of the unknown. 

So how do we deal with this paradox?  I contend that it cannot be solved on earth.  While we are here, we will constantly be striving for the next new thing, and yet scared of what is around the corner.  I believe this is by design, this is not our home.  We were created with certain tendencies to point us to our Creator.  This is true here.  In God we have the perfect harmony between our need of change and our fear of it.  First let us examine the fear of change.  We know that God is immutable, He does not change ever.  This we can be sure of.  He will always be what He was today, and we know who He is from His perfect Word.  We need not fear, because He will not change.  Now lets deal with the second part; that is our need for change.  How can an unchanging God solve that?  He solves it perfectly.  Our God is so great that we will never be bored of Him, and in need of something new.  We can search Him out for 100,000 years and not even wrap our arms around his foothill.  What an amazing thought!  In God the problem caused by the paradox is fixed.  In Christ we find our complete fulfillment.  He is everything.  Sola Christus!!!!

Libya

After months of conflict Libya, Ghadaffi has be murdered, and the revolution is over.  As is always the case the U.S has troubled itself with a conflict they have no buisness being in.  Non-interventionism is dead, and our politicians feel the need to poke their heads in every conflict.  Whether it be Hitlery Clinton referring to the rebels as 'we', or Obama congratulating them on their victory. The question now becomes, what is next?

For months, anyone who has their eyes open, has asked this question.  Who will replace the hated dictator? We now have our answer; the Muslim Brotherhood.  What is being propped up in the media as a 'democratic victory' is nothing more than yet another takeover over by the 'peaceful grassroots' organization known as the Muslim Brotherhood, or the Arab Springs. 

I think it is first important to know that democracy is not the great thing that it is propped up to be.  The Founders warned against the 'evil of the 51%'.  Democracy, is not only impratical, it is also dangerous, as 51% could opress millions of people.  Having said that, the new gov't in Libya is NOT a democracy.  Leaders have announced that the country will be run 'on the principles of Sharia law', i.e a theocracy.  No matter what lies are out there today, Sharia law is barbaric and evil.  Woman aren't allowed to drive, and are not allowed outside the house without being with a man related to them.  If you steal, you get your hand cut off.  Those who turn from the faith are killed.  Woman have no rights.  Four men must testify to convict a man of raping a woman.  Evil.  Possibly the scariest fact is that Libya is just one of the several new nations under the control of the radical Islamic, Muslim Brotherhood.  The stated goal of this alliance is to prepare for war against Israel.  And don't misunderstand; we're next.  In the words of Ahmadinejad; Israel is the little satan and we are the big satan.  So while our politicians are praising this 'peoples democracy', don't believe the lies.  The Muslim Brotherhood is a dangerous force, and Libya may be worse off now then ever.